Risk Areas

1.1 Mission Employment

Explanation of risk area

Overseas deployments can be lucrative postings, both in terms of additional remuneration and in terms of career prospects: additional training and experience gained during missions can lead to more attractive professional options afterwards. Where strong merit-based recruitment systems, coupled with independent controls, are absent, postings can be allocated on the basis of bribery or patronage.

Examples

Case Study: Corruption and UN peace operations

Bribery in mission employment: UN peacekeepers

In 2014, an internal UN investigation showed that eight police officers from Côte d’Ivoire had paid money to Ivorian counterparts at the UN to secure deployments to MINUSTAH and MONUSCO. The Deputy Permanent Representative of the Cote d’Ivoire mission, whose position allowed him to influence hiring, would charge $4,000 to arrange placements. Allegations of bribery in the selection process for UN peacekeepers have recurred in other troop contributing countries (TCCs), including the Philippines and Bangladesh.

View case study
External Link

Recruitment in troop contributing countries

Patronage and political allegiance to ruling parties appear to be important deciding factors for recruitment in some troop contributing countries such as Bangladesh, Brazil, Burundi, Cameroon, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Morocco, Rwanda, and South Africa. In Niger, for example, the Djema ethnic group tend to be favoured by the military, and in Togo, approximately 80% of the officers are from the Kabye ethnic group whilst they only constitute 23% of the population. Most of the top 25 troop contributing countries do not have open and public recruitment processes for UN peacekeeping operations, and the criteria for selecting those who deploy are unclear.

View external case study

Indicators & Warnings

Requests to employ particular individuals, often while circumventing official recruitment processes

Recruitment of individuals who manifestly do not meet job requirements

Prevalence of recruits from one ethnic or social group

Poor documentation for travel and other expenses (could indicate diversion of allowances)

Reports of bribery in recruitment

Risk Areas within Risk Pathway 1. Corruption in mission forces

1.1 Mission Employment

Overseas postings and deployments often result in additional remuneration and more attractive professional development opportunities, making mission employment at key risk area for corruption in military operations.

Explore Risk Area

1.2 Sustainment and Contracting

The World Bank estimates that public contract awards of about $1.5 trillion are influenced by corruption. Risks affecting procurement are magnified in operational environments due to tight timelines, high levels of outsourcing and fewer checks and balances.

Explore Risk Area

Mitigations within Risk Pathway 1. Corruption in mission forces

These are some of the measures that can be applied by national defence institutions in preparing their troops for deployment. Many – from the codification of standards, training, and an internal investigative structure – can also be used by international organisations to prepare national contingents for deployment, and to set requirements for troop contributing countries.

Cooperation with civil society could help increase the likelihood of whistleblower reports of wrongdoing among mission personnel, and could help provide an additional layer of oversight, where possible, in mission sustainment and reconstruction contracts.

Better monitoring and oversight of mission funds and activities, as well as strengthening host nation and external oversight, can help diminish the opportunities for corruption in mission activities.