3.1 Resource diversion and corruption in the acquisition process
Corruption related to materiel, be that in procurement, logistics, or asset management and disposal, is one of the most frequent forms of illicit activity in the armed forces.
Risk Areas
Perhaps due to a widespread perception of healthcare as a universal good, it is often seen as a sector immune from corruption. The complexity of healthcare-related issues, the power imbalance between practitioner and patient, and the multitude of stakeholders involved are only some of the factors that make healthcare susceptible to corruption risks, especially in fragile and conflict-affected environments where the needs are greater and capacities, especially for oversight, lower.
Greater casualties
Morale depletion
Waste of resources
Overall lower effectiveness of partner forces
At the Dawood National Military Hospital in Afghanistan – a US-funded and overseen project in Kabul – corrupt personnel embezzled funds, extorted bribes from families of Afghan military officers, and suppressed complaints and whistleblower reports; one high-ranking Afghan officer embezzled almost $20 million in US funds. The price of corruption was paid in human suffering as care for the wounded was compromised and some patients became malnourished. US officers responsible for running the hospital suppressed reports of wrongdoing and attempted to stonewall investigations demanded by healthcare personnel.
View external case studyDeployed medic experience indicates that low wages and dangerous postings for Afghan National Army medics meant that many attempted to supplement their income through parallel, better-paid jobs which would take them away from the field. The practice was recognised and condoned by senior officers, but it meant that ANA units would need to do without medics for extended period of time in combat. As NATO increasingly drew down the mission and there were fewer international officers and medics to fill in, casualties rose: the ANA suffered over 5000 killed and 14,000 wounded many of them in Helmand during the ISAF draw-down
View external case studyWitness and whistleblower reports of corruption in healthcare systems
Lack of medication that has been paid for or supplied
Personnel shortages and absences
Inadequate provision of care
Unexplained wealth among healthcare providers
Corruption related to materiel, be that in procurement, logistics, or asset management and disposal, is one of the most frequent forms of illicit activity in the armed forces.
Explore Risk Area
Both bribery and patronage in recruitment distort a meritocratic process meant to put the best people in particular posts.
Explore Risk Area
A significant risk can come with any discretionary expenditure that occurs in secret and has little to no oversight. These budget lines are vulnerable to diversion and misuse for private gain.
Explore Risk Area
Absence of personnel and inaccurate data waste resources, impede operational planning and execution, and can lead to operational failures.
Explore Risk Area
Whether subject to extortion or in danger of physical harm, the civilian population begins to see the armed forces as part of the problem rather than part of the solution.
Explore Risk Area
Where armed forces support or lead operations against criminal and insurgent groups, infiltration by said groups – especially when their resources exceed those of particular units – is a very real risk.
Explore Risk Area
The complexity of healthcare-related issues, the power imbalance between practitioner and patient, and the multitude of stakeholders involved are only some of the factors that make healthcare susceptible to corruption risks.
Explore Risk Area
With preferential access to state resources – from budgets to communications networks to transportation corridors – and an ability to secure incentives such as tax breaks or conscript labour, armed forces which turn to economic activity enjoy an unfair advantage over civilian actors.
Explore Risk Area
Strong integrity standards among mission troops and their ability to notice and report corruption can help identify corruption problems among partner forces.
When corruption occurs due to lack of resources or inability to meet basic needs, providing assistance can help change incentives and rationales.
Ensuring that financial flows do not exceed the host nation’s absorptive capacity will diminish the risk of diversion by corrupt networks; tying funding and assistance to improvements in governance can help create momentum for reform.
Supporting civilian initiatives such as reform of the judiciary can help create accountability for the defence and security forces, and using a full spectrum to shape incentives could render corruption less attractive at strategic, operational and tactical levels.
Civil society organisations can be valuable allies in the fight against corruption, at a strategy-setting level and when attempting to limit low-level corruption that feeds higher-level networks. Their participation is also key to establishing healthy civil-military relations.
These are specific measures targeted at improving the integrity and effectiveness of defence and security forces. Their utility depends on the type of corrupt practices affecting a particular force.
Stronger oversight of mission resources will help limit opportunities for corrupt networks, and helping develop host nation or civil society oversight mechanisms will help create longer-term accountability of host nation forces.
Ensuring that the international mission is able to receive and process signals of wrongdoing increases the likelihood of detection and diminishes the appeal of corruption.