2.1 State capture and criminal patronage networks
Military operations intervene with significant resources at their disposal. Such extensive resources can have unintended consequences if they are allowed to strengthen malign networks.
Risk Areas
International troops often control transport routes and nodes, including airports and road checkpoints. They can be mandated with protecting humanitarian convoys and with enforcing limitations on trade in conflict areas, from controlling the flow of weapons to verifying the bona fides of convoys carrying food and medicines. They usually enjoy immunity from controls themselves, with mission vehicles exempt from searches and mission IDs allowing access to resources and restricted facilities, including storage and distribution centres.
Damage of mission reputation and diminishing of trust
Case Study: Corruption and UN peace operations
During the siege of Sarajevo, UNPROFOR troops had control of the city’s airport and were mandated with protecting the passage of humanitarian assistance. Reports indicate that international troops took advantage of their position at the airport, sometimes for reasons of compassion, but sometimes for their private profit. This included taking bribes to look the other way while items were being smuggled in and out of the city, or taking a more active role and participating in moving black market goods into the city and people out of it. Canadian members of UNPROFOR allegedly sold fuel, cigarettes, alcohol, coffee, clothing, and in one case, weaponry, on the black market in besieged towns.
View case studyCase Study: Corruption and UN peace operations
Members of various UNPROFOR contingents would smuggle fuel siphoned from their armoured personnel carriers, and heroin into the city to sell on the black market. They also reportedly ran a car smuggling scheme, getting them out of Sarajevo to Belgrade in UN containers, providing false documents, and shipping them abroad. Others smuggled and sold weapons that were ordered for them, often using UN vehicles for transport.
View case studyCase Study: Corruption and UN peace operations
MONUSCO troops from Pakistan and India were found to have been involved in trading gold, ivory, and weapons with rebels in DRC, particularly the Forces Democratiques De Liberation Du Rwanda (FDLR) and the Front des Nationalistes et Intégrationnistes (FNI), the latter accused of large-scale human rights abuses. Pakistani troops stationed at Mongbwalu were accused of trading gold with the FNI militia and arming them to guard the perimeter of the gold mines in the area, allegedly supplying them with weapons obtained through the DDR process. MONUSCO troops were thus explicitly violating their mandate, which included DDR of Congolese militia. In addition, Human Rights Watch has found that a ring of Congolese Army officers, Kenyan traders, and Pakistani peacekeepers were involved in the smuggling of millions of dollars of gold from Ituri. Assistance provided by Pakistani troops for this trade included accommodation, transportation, security, and access to UN flights.
View case studyPost-2014, Ukrainian troops stationed in the east of the country have been implicated in facilitating lucrative trade to the Non-Government Controlled Areas. Troops have accepted bribes for letting unauthorised articles through road checkpoints, have coordinated with smugglers to agree on alternative routes which would not be patrolled at specific times, and allowed smugglers to use large storage facilities intended for humanitarian aid transport. The opportunity to solicit bribes at checkpoints is reported to be one of the reasons for soldiers to request postings there, and the bribes move up the chain of command.
View external case studyReports of illegal trade
Violence patterns that are difficult to explain (they don't match predictions based on conflict patterns and troop positioning)
Living beyond means (security forces officers who facilitate the trade)
Increased reports of smuggling, including across borders
Unexplained vehicle and aircraft movements
Reports of contraband in host nation and/or regional markets
Military operations intervene with significant resources at their disposal. Such extensive resources can have unintended consequences if they are allowed to strengthen malign networks.
Explore Risk Area
Working with the local community is a necessity for obtaining intelligence in the operational theatre, however there are significant risks for corruption involved in relying heavily on one or a few sources.
Explore Risk Area
Employment of private militia and security companies can have long term consequences as resources and support can enable them to comete with state structures.
Explore Risk Area
Privileged access and the mandate to control shipments are necessary for international missions to do their jobs; however, they can also create opportunities for corruption and abuse of entrusted position, often for private gain.
Explore Risk Area
The access that international missions have to basic resources such as food, water and medication has in the past opened door to sexual abuse. This involves an abuse of entrusted powers – distribution of resources and keeping of peace – for private gratification.
Explore Risk Area
Promoting strong integrity standards among mission personnel can help set expectations for relations with the host nation, and prevent creation of new opportunities for corrupt networks.
Supporting those who are willing to join legitimate, inclusive governance structures can help create an alternative to the power of corrupt networks.
Ensuring political support and resource flows to those with an interest in a peaceful, stable solution to the conflict.
Ensuring that financial flows do not exceed the host nation’s absorptive capacity will diminish the risk of diversion by corrupt networks; tying funding and assistance to improvements in governance can help create momentum for reform.
Supporting civilian initiatives such as reform of the judiciary can help create counter-balance to state capture, and using a full spectrum to shape incentives could render corruption less attractive at strategic, operational and tactical levels.
Civil society organisations can be valuable allies in the fight against corruption, at a strategy-setting level and when attempting to limit low-level corruption that feeds higher-level networks.
Stronger oversight of mission resources will help limit opportunities for corrupt networks, and helping develop host nation or civil society oversight mechanisms will help create longer-term accountability of host nation forces.
Ensuring that the international mission is able to receive and process signals of wrongdoing increases the likelihood of detection and diminishes the appeal of corruption.
Mitigate corruption risks in sustainment and contracting to limit the flow of resources to corrupt networks.